Regulation

CDU Economic Council Hands Germany a Blueprint to Drain Its Gambling Black Market

A reform paper from the CDU-linked Economic Council tells Germany's governing party how to fix the 2021 State Treaty, from scrapping the 5.3% turnover tax to ending an enforcement gap that leaves up to 80% of online slot play on illegal sites.

·5 min read
CDU Economic Council Hands Germany a Blueprint to Drain Its Gambling Black Market

Germany's governing Christian Democratic Union now has a written plan for fixing the country's broken gambling market, and the central recommendation is to stop punishing the licensed operators that the 2021 State Treaty was supposed to protect. The reform proposal comes from the Economic Council, a business association tied to the CDU, whose federal working group "More Private Sector for a Strong State" argues that the treaty (GluStV 2021) needs legislative surgery before a scheduled government evaluation concludes at the end of 2026. The paper lands at a useful moment for operators: the CDU is the party in power, so its house think tank's advice has a direct route into policy.

The numbers behind the proposal are the reason it exists. Germany taxes online slot wagers at 5.3% per stake rather than taxing gross gaming revenue, and it caps stakes at one euro per spin alongside a 1,000-euro (about $1,070) monthly deposit limit. That combination has produced one of the weakest legal channels in Europe. H2 Gambling Capital pegs overall channelisation at 22% to 25% and projects a drop toward 20% by 2030. For online slots specifically, the Deutscher Online Casinoverband (DOCV) puts the legal share at 20% to 40%, which means most slot money in Germany flows to operators with no German licence. On the sports side the Deutscher Sportwettenverband (DSWV) counts 11 times more illegal betting providers than licensed ones, while DSWV president Mathias Dahms estimates sports betting channelisation at a healthier 60% to 70%.

What the paper actually recommends

The Economic Council frames the problem as an "enforcement asymmetry": licensed providers operate under a dense web of deposit limits, advertising restrictions and product bans, while illegal sites operate largely unhindered. Its fixes target that gap rather than the players.

RecommendationWhat it changes
Rebalance treaty objectivesGive "freedom of choice" equal weight to player protection, ending what the Council calls years of overregulation
Rolling evaluation clauseContinuous independent research that halts ineffective rules immediately, instead of renegotiating the whole treaty at once
Align tax with EU normsMove the 5.3% turnover tax toward standard European GGR-based ranges to keep the legal market attractive
Risk-based player protectionReplace blanket bans with data-driven early-warning systems aimed at genuinely at-risk players
Streamlined licensingEnd the current split of products into separate approvals
Focus enforcement on illegal supplyRoutine measurement of each rule's effect on player behaviour, with prevention aimed at the black market rather than licensed firms

The tax line is the one operators will read first. Industry figures sit roughly 15% below pre-2021 levels, and tax revenue from virtual slot games fell by more than half between 2021 and 2024, evidence the Council uses to argue that the turnover model shrinks the legal base instead of feeding state coffers. The European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA) has said plainly that Germany will struggle to move forward under the current rules, a view that aligns with Brussels weighing its own bloc-wide gambling levy and the broader European debate over how to tax the sector without driving play offshore.

Why this matters for operators and affiliates

The precedent is already on the record, and it is not encouraging. Before the treaty took effect, a 2021 Handelsblatt Research Institute study commissioned by the trade body Eco warned that more than 40% of online casino players would seek offshore alternatives if the new conditions made legal play worse. Economist Bert Rürup put it bluntly at the time, and the years since have tracked his forecast. By 2024, data cited by iGaming Business from Yield Sec counted 1,926 unlicensed operators targeting Germany, roughly 15.8 million Germans interacting with illegal sites, and around 4 billion euros (about $4.3 billion) in black-market gross gaming revenue, more than half of total market activity. The regulator's own 2024 estimate of a 25% black market is far rosier than the industry's, which itself signals how contested the baseline is.

Enforcement has not closed the gap. Germany's Gemeinsame Glücksspielbehörde der Länder (GGL) has blocked or rendered inaccessible over 930 unlicensed domains and adds about 60 per month, and it used payment blocking for the first time in 2023. But a 2024 Federal Administrative Court ruling curbed the GGL's ability to force IP blocking through internet access providers, pushing the regulator toward slower host-based takedowns. The Council's pitch is that supply-side enforcement alone cannot win when the legal product is taxed and capped into uncompetitiveness, so the fix has to be demand-side: make the licensed offer good enough that players stay.

For affiliates the read is concrete. A German market with channelisation near 20% is a market where the addressable licensed audience is a fraction of total play, and where compliant traffic competes against a far larger pool of offshore brands that out-supply legal sites by an estimated 9 to 1 on product range. If the CDU adopts even the tax and licensing recommendations, the legal funnel widens and compliant affiliate inventory gains value. The same dynamic is visible in the UK push to pressure big tech over black-market gambling ads. It also tracks markets like Estonia, where a new gambling tax produced a slow operator start. The treaty evaluation concludes by the end of 2026, and the Economic Council's paper is the clearest signal yet of what the governing party may carry into it.

Written by

ET

Editorial Team

iGaming News Editorial

Keep reading